Dan Savage's new book The Commitment arrived in my mailbox last week. John and I are rabid fans of Savage's sex-and-advice column, Savage Love. I've thoroughly enjoyed Dan's other books. I wasn't disappointed with this one, either: The Commitment is a scream to read. I howled when Dan and his partner Terry headed into a wedding expo in Seattle - just to do a little research for Dan's column.
One thing irked me about the book, though. Our two heroes take a driving trip with their son from Seattle to Michigan. They had some strange phobia about The Red States. What did they expect? To be tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail? This false dichotomization between The Red States and The Blue States is some scheme that the media has invented to sell copy. Iowa, for instance, voted (barely) for Gore in 2000 and (barely again) for Bush in 2004. We're purple, as Garrison Keillor suggests. Most folks I know in Iowa dislike both parties pretty soundly. Yeah, there are bigots. But there are bigots in just about every place - and most folks are pretty good hearted. Take a company I consulted for in Iowa, for instance. One lesbian who worked there and her partner went to Cambodia - twice - to adopt kids. So what did the company do in our state far from the 'enlightened coasts'? It gave them a camcorder to record their adventures.
And what about John and me and the marriage thing?
We think about marriage every week, actually. The Cedar Rapids Gazette features a picture section each week on Sunday called Milestones. It overflows with pictures of recently betrothed and wedded couples - usually pudgy guys with goatees and their slightly zaftig Hausfraus-to-be - with a few anniversary pictures sprinkled in to show what marriage and a few years does to people. No Sunday morning is complete without our expert handicapping the couples as to whether they'll be adding to or subtracting from the gene pool by their progeny. (Our casual estimate is that we're doomed as a species.)
Now if marriage for queers was legal in Iowa and actually bestowed rights that accrued federally, we'd march down and get our license in a minute. I've not talked with John about this but I'm pretty sure he feels as I do about it. But the idea of getting a marriage license in another country (like Canada, as Savage and his partner did) or another state seems pretty pointless when it has no legal meaning. If you sense that I'm not particularly interested in some external religious authority blessing us, you're right. I want civil benefits, not a party. If I want a spiritual blessing, I'll do that myself.
In 1998 John and I did two weddings in two weeks in two countries - for the same couple - John's best straight friend. At the first wedding one of the bride's friends, a Unitarian pastor, befriended us. As the bridal couple did their thing on the Caribbean sands, the pastor asked me if John and I ever wanted to be married. I recited what we'd done with each other, the emotional things as well as the financial things. "You're already married," she said.
I don't have a story as riveting as Savage's about commitment, but here goes. John came to visit me in California for Valentine's Day in 1997. We'd been dating long-distance for two years. Yeah, I adored him. Two days later we celebrated my birthday - my last in California. Two days after that, 18 Feb 1997, the movers came. John was taking me back to Iowa to live with him. I was scared to death.
We had our dinner that night at The Fish Market in Palo Alto. We'd eaten there the first night we spent together two years before. Then we headed back home. I stood upstairs looking out the window in my bedroom at my rose garden. Why the hell was I leaving?
I turned around. John was standing silently at the top of the stairs, watching me. He said not a word. I have no idea how long he had stood there, just letting me be. I turned to him. We herded my dog Ki into the Explorer; John had made a nest for him in the back seat. I set the timers to turn the lights on and off inside the condo, then I shut the door and locked the deadbolt. The gate behind me clanked shut. I sat down in the driver's seat and backed the Explorer out of my life in California.
As we drove past San Jose and through Gilroy we started talking about us. I asked him if he might want a ring.
"I can't wear a ring," he said. "I can't wear it with power tools. It could get caught on something and I'd wind up losing a finger. And there's all the wood finishing chemicals." He was quiet for a moment. Then he said, "But I'd wear your ring." As we drove onto I-5 south we were deep in quiet talk. But I think that was the last time we talked about rings and ceremonies.
We never did anything about a ceremony. We never hosted a party - at least not just one big party for our friends about us. We did something else. We created our own commitment. It wasn't particularly emotional or sexy. We visited our lawyer's office and hammered out legal agreements around the house, for end-of-life decisions, about wills and property deeds. Not sexy. But it put us on a real legal footing.
I still think about it, sometimes. About a year ago I found a queer goldsmith who creates marvelous wedding rings for guys. I might surprise John someday.